MUMTAZ ALI versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Property presented against the Section 497 Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) state counsel for bail, said the defendant was a frustrated and Was a dangerous person because there are four robbery cases pending. He and the Superintendent Prison moved the Department of Interior to trial the state prosecutor's suspects in the jail, however, acknowledged that there was no recovery from the suspect and that the accused in any case pending against him. He was not convicted, so it was difficult to maintain that the accused was a frustrated and dangerous person even in cases where the inquiry was disclosed even on the merits of the accused. The accused was released on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kharan lawyer
