CENTRAL TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary injections and interlocutory orders A XXXIX, RR l & 2 injections, appellants 'grants were allowed to be loaned in exchange for the terms of the respondents' financially operated units. I will clear the amount owed. At the time of the opening of the Letter of Credit and the approval of the foreign lending agency appellants were subject to the availability of debt consolidation, the approval of which was subsequently canceled due to non-payment of loans to their sister companies whose directors Appellants, as appellants, were instructed to direct the applicants to direct and maintain the foreign exchange and to use it or to use it without court approval on this basis. Stop allowing it to end so that sister companies have nothing to do with it. Appellants dismissed by a single judge order could not be resolved point-to-point in the dispute until the evidence w as brought to the record, appellants failed to show a first case, that they would suffer irreparable harm or convenience. The balance was in their favor, the application for a restraining order, rightly denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer