BEFORE AJMAL MIAN, CJ. AND ABDUL RAHIM KAZI, J SYED ZAHID HUSSAIN versus HOECHST PAKISTAN LIMITED
Section 25A & 38 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicants 'Complaint against Termination of Applicants Applicants' Court Appeals Against Applicant's Termination, Instead of referring the applicant to the Labor Court for his complaint. , Another appeal was filed before the Federal Minister, which was still pending the applicant's complaint, with time restriction. In a similar case where a co-worker's request was also banned, the Labor Court restrained the worker And the appeal against it was rejected by a co-worker of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, whose case was referred by the applicant, on this issue on different grounds as the rights of the parties in this case were heard by the civil court. And the decree was approved. In the present case, the dismissal of the employee's complaint was denied by the Labor Court and the order was upheld. The Labor Appellate Tribunal had passed such order through the Labor Court and the Appellate Tribunal had upheld it. It was more than jurisdictional or lacked jurisdiction, the constitutional petition was dismissed from merit against such order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Ukba lawyer