Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1973), Section 4 Martial Law Orders 1977 (CMLA) No. 23, Para 3 Government employees appeal against compulsory retirement from the service tribunal's High Court. In the case of service under the relevant constitutional jurisdiction, the appeal to the service tribunal should be withdrawn and the jurisdiction of the High Court against the filing of a review application under the provisions of MLR 23, which does not actually have jurisdiction, In the context of Article 212 of the Constitution, which was covered, the matter of the Act was not actually a jurisdiction. By the Service Tribunals Act, it will not receive jurisdiction only because of the fact that the applicant had the option to either withdraw the appeal and file a review application or appeal it to the service tribunal. To sue, and that made the former lawyer's choice unsuccessful.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Musakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.