SABZAL versus BINGO
Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O IX, R9 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5 constitutional jurisdiction, the exercise of the requirements where the unauthorized order passed by the amending court was a legal violation. Was approved in a legal proceeding. And having suffered no deficiency in jurisdiction and no law or equality, the High Court refused to interfere with such order in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court delayed the trial. In order to consider the applicant's application, he also refused to be remanded for trial. The filing of such constitutional petitions was dismissed by the High Court which prevents the high courts from illegal litigation and causes unnecessary delays in the disposal of other cases.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Hazro lawyer