HAFIZ SABAHUDDIN JAMY versus OBAIDUR REHMAN KHAN D.G., F.I.A., ISLAMABAD
Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 (4) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Seniority Promotion Appellant A Grade 19 officer, was dismissed, but was notified when his colleagues promoted him to Grade 20. Was released when the appellant on the claim of rehabilitation had made progress in its history and consequently stayed away from the job when the appellant was asked by the president to use his ability and Was neither taken under discipline nor under MLR 114 and was restored to employment by order. The appellant assigned to him, exercising the full powers of the Chief Martial Law Administrator, did not depart from the tenure of his former juniors, who were promoted during the appellant, out of their service. Appellant made no representation against the seniority list. In which their status is shown below. His appeal to the juniors was also affected by the proviso (a) of section 4 (1) of section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1. 973 Appellant's claim that his sanity was not allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Dargai lawyer