Section 13 students, Ashdad, demanded plaintiff's performance in his orbit claiming student performance on 6-9 2004, but failed to mention the date for sending notice of students and assassins to him who was fatal. Was. Wanted to be made as soon as possible after the performance of Macbeth but it was necessary to mention all the details in the plaintiffs for more than 14 days so that the preamper importer did not improve his case during the trial or departed. Don't be His petitions had to first be appealed to the facts and petitions and then the party could not be allowed to amend his case to prove such facts through evidence which was originally formulated in the petitions. That is, the party could not be allowed to produce evidence with it. In the case of the petition that was not taken into account and if it was directed, the evidence could not be considered in this case as the factual findings of the facts were recorded by the bills of the two courts. Oh, which was based on proper definition of evidence, in the present case, any mis-writing and proof-reading was avoided, no weaknesses were identified in the unknown verdicts and the review under the orders was approved by the courts below. Was.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
