MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FAISALABAD
Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 Rr 6 (3) and 9 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4, there is no simple reversal from holding office because of mismanagement, but the amount of penalty. Was allegedly found guilty of corruption. A returned to the important post of Section I and was subsequently issued with a show cause notice on mismanagement and was fined two years with approved service with permanent effect. The service tribunal concluded that the appellant had to file a record of misconduct on the basis of documentary evidence. The officer was, at times, equal to the punishment and the appellant could not be given two sentences of competent authority, not on the basis of fair acting, equity and reversal of justice, but the penalty for confiscating the service was maintained. But its position has been made effective in implementation. Sub Inspector
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
