DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD YASIN BHATTI
Article 12 () (Punjab Civil Servants (Qualifications & Discipline) Rules, 1975, R13) challenging the Tribunal challenging the service tribunal under which the penalty for stopping the increase on respondents has been upheld but theft. Due to this, the government has retained the penalty of recovering the loss representing this loss. Sugar was set aside The tribunal found that the defendant was not liable for damages and the department had already punished the other persons involved in the theft case. After examining such record, the tribunal found the record invalid or unjustified. Cannot be understood. Refuse to appeal the law of public importance for consideration
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Havelian lawyer
