ABDUL HAMID versus GHULAM RASUL
Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) (A) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), excluding section 199, the constitutional jurisdiction, the misrepresentation of record by the appellate court and the removal of estimated results based on personal need. It is important to keep the appeal on the ground. Given that the personal need was not real and the renters paid the rent because it was too low, it may have been motivated by the desire to obtain the rent from the eviction that the district judge's finding was based on speculation. Was, on the basis of the misinterpretation of the record and the evidence drawn out of context, the High was set aside. Constitutional jurisdiction in High Court was permissible under circumstances to interfere with the order of appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Lower Dir lawyer