Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL HAMID versus GHULAM RASUL


Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) (A) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), excluding section 199, the constitutional jurisdiction, the misrepresentation of record by the appellate court and the removal of estimated results based on personal need. It is important to keep the appeal on the ground. Given that the personal need was not real and the renters paid the rent because it was too low, it may have been motivated by the desire to obtain the rent from the eviction that the district judge's finding was based on speculation. Was, on the basis of the misinterpretation of the record and the evidence drawn out of context, the High was set aside. Constitutional jurisdiction in High Court was permissible under circumstances to interfere with the order of appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Lower Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.