MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
AXXI, R 32 Restraining order prohibiting defendants from forcibly interfering with a defendant's judge in a restraining order, contempt of court proceedings to restore possession within two months. But consequently failed to take action. The decree was purely declaratory and was not executable at all, and for violation of order prohibited under R 32 (5) of O XXI, CPC's reply The decree-holder was not entitled to any special relief; the revoked order was permanent and permanent. To prevent interference and that (1), (2) and (3) the injunction should apply to both cases of immunity and enable the holder to put the family in a civil jail and attach the decision maker. Property and thereby compel it to comply with Rule 32 (5). Which
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Peshawar lawyer
