NASIM AHMAD KHAN versus NIAZ AKHTAR
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) Allow Appeal to Examine Questions (i) That the appellate authority wrongly misrepresented the rent controller's decision. (ii) The rent controller made a positive and accurate finding after discussing the evidence. (iii) The appellate authority had adopted the wrong view of the law that only documentary evidence and documentary evidence alone could establish the payment of rent and in the absence of it, the payment of rent could not be proved. (iv) that the appellate authority misunderstood the property counsel's statement so that the default charge could be read, and (v) that the High Court unlawfully upheld (reconciliation and arbitration) to uphold the order. Action). When you can only be ordered to be excluded on a legal basis and otherwise not, the writ petition is rejected and rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Shorkot lawyer