Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NASIM AHMAD KHAN versus NIAZ AKHTAR


Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) Allow Appeal to Examine Questions (i) That the appellate authority wrongly misrepresented the rent controller's decision. (ii) The rent controller made a positive and accurate finding after discussing the evidence. (iii) The appellate authority had adopted the wrong view of the law that only documentary evidence and documentary evidence alone could establish the payment of rent and in the absence of it, the payment of rent could not be proved. (iv) that the appellate authority misunderstood the property counsel's statement so that the default charge could be read, and (v) that the High Court unlawfully upheld (reconciliation and arbitration) to uphold the order. Action). When you can only be ordered to be excluded on a legal basis and otherwise not, the writ petition is rejected and rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Shorkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.