MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 2302 / evidence 34 Recovered from re-evidence Two suspects were affected by the recovery of the suspect and blood-stained dagger on the identification of the second suspect when the investigating officer and the recovered: The two accused were the witnesses and the accused were led by two different persons. At the places where they hid their weapons, the fact that both weapons were used in the commission of the crime was also supported by the serologist Injury's report on one of the suspects, who was the date of the incident. Was compatible with An additional basis for proving his participation in the appellate court, along with the trial of the crime, although he is keeping away from considering evidence of isolation recovery, believes in the version of the investigating officer as a stock witness. And that's just because the police officer was like a good one: I have to testify as any other witness and even because nothing was brought on record by the defense.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kalaswala lawyer