ALLAH DITTA versus STATE
The effect of a conviction under Section 10 (3) of the Ordinance (VII VII), between the parties on the conviction of a crime of adultery, Section 7 (3), 7 years imprisonment, 20 stripes and the parties to the penalty. , With the latter being compromised, the complainant was forgiven and some compensation was paid The question arises whether the accused was not entitled to relief in the case of punishment, the accused was not liable for limitation. Was punished with impunity; it was left at the discretion of the court, keeping in view the appropriate sentence. The complainant who imposed all relevant facts within the limits set out in section 10 (3) and stated that it is in the best interest of all that if the sentence given to the accused can be reduced, The court may hold a hearing. And, if, in such cases, the law should reduce the punishment of the accused to 4 years imprisonment, it was set aside but the money
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khanbel lawyer
