Find a Lawyer

FATIMA versus ABDUL RAZZAK

Comparison of the signature with the accepted signature of section7373 The respondent denying his signature with the accepted signature and the matching between the two signatures, challenged the plaintiff that the evidence was in favor of the court pursuant to section 7373 of the Evidence Act. This is not proof from the comparison of the signatures. Depending on the case of the dependents and the respondents, such a comparison may be presented as fact finding and in the presence of the parties to the court under section in73 of Act73 (Act 72 of 1872). The law does not prohibit acts. If the respondents need any regular offer to prove the match invalid, the respondent could have asked for additional / additional opportunities from the court if the appellate court is advised that there is a lack of anything necessary. No and significant variations can be explained when searching for similarities. In no way was the respondent cted to deny respondent's signature ridge, cted family advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer