SAMI ULLAH, MANAGING PARTNER, MESSRS SHIFA MEDICO (REGD.) versus MUHAMMAD ASHIQ KHAN ABDALI
Section 13 (8) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The tenant was already physically excluded to appeal the decision that the tenant in control of the tenant without hearing the tenant. No order for payment of rent should have been approved and at any cost it was stated that the rent controller was wrongdoing as long as there was proper calculation of the amount owed, he feared before the High Court like this. Was not disputed before the Supreme Court refused to observe such questions at the discharge stage with observation. This was a question of fact and if this same argument were presented to the High Court, in the same manner, before the Supreme Court, the position would have been different.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer