Find a Lawyer

NAZIR versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA

Section 21 pre-emption suit is not appropriate by the two courts, so the question of so-called default on the alleged reduction in payment of court fees was resolved by the Supreme Court decision in the case of Siddique Khan PLD 1984 SC 289. That was in his favor. Appellants, with the observation that the appellant was allowed that the appellate time should be allowed by the trial court to deposit the remaining amount after the notice. property advocate from Shujabad lawyer