Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL HAMID SAQFI versus SERVICE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN


Arts 188 and 190 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, AXXVI, R 1 The decision of the Supreme Court to review / clarify the applicant wishes to review the clarification of the decision so that the parties to the question of its process and law may have Action should be taken against these parties to keep the impact limited. As a result, the parties decided: Such an explanation could not be adopted for all the executive and judicial authorities of Pakistan, given that the constitutional obligation was to authorize the Supreme Court to assist. Do not reject merit for review.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Chawinda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.