CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, LAHORE versus HASSAN MUHAMMAD
Section / / Authority Assumption of Dedicated Property The notification to accept multiple properties as allegedly dedicated property to the multiple property issued by the Authority respondents claim that the properties included under the notification were not immovable property. The property was acquired by his predecessor so that nothing is available in the record to indicate it. As before the respondents were associated with the shrine, the predecessor assumed the position of the throne, which he declared to be his own property, there was no evidence that the shrine's offering was available. Fox-acquired properties were used or subscriptions would be raised to acquire them, leaving the law on dedication or duty-related properties that did not meet the law's requirements. Any nexus, connected, serves a permanent purpose of the property
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
