Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 10 Proper trial for possession by pre-arrest, trial court's right, evidence to provide vendors only opportunity, the lower appellate court approved the trial court's order. On the one hand, the trial court remanded the verdict. This case was set for final arguments for the 25th, 2011, after a vendor confirmation trial, without the closing of vendor evidence, on the 22nd of 2011, on the contrary, the testimony of the witnesses The case for the inclusion of source evidence began in the year 2001, and on 1 3 2011, oral evidence was closed and the last opportunity to present documentary evidence was given to the present emperors for 5 3 2011 to present evidence to the pre-emperors. I had been around for about ten years, while the shopkeepers were given only one chance for that purpose as Wendys was deprived of unnecessary skin. The opportunity to present evidence in light of Zee's case appeared in the orders passed by the trial court and was in breach of Article 10A of the Constitution and a decree passed by the lower appellate court with its jurisdiction. And there was no illegality or weakness that was rejected under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014