Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (REVENUE); BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE

The challenged decree passed by the courts under the cases filed by Section V & Wendy Applicant applicant has been approved on the basis that the facts of the tenancy provided by the trial court in favor of the defendant. The evidence is based on misinterpretation and can make a claim based on the tenancy. Judging only the extent of a portion of the land and not the entire suit for the land which is on record shows that the trial court has sought the facts and the tenancy by the High Court. Confirmed that it does not allow for any form of weakness, legal or otherwise, to appeal. Denied in the circumstances advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes