Sections 4 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11, petitioner Wendy contends that, due to the reduction of court fees, the respondent was responsible for dismissing the former Importer's lawyer. The position taken by the applicant under the judgment of the Hon'ble in PLD 1984 SC 289, which went against the leave for the petitioner, denied the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
