MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR
Section 2302 / Constitution 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 302/34, PPC extended the sentence for the accused accused and the appellate court was punished that the words of heat were injured. ? There was an exchange between the parties and it was a sudden feud that broke out without any sense of emotion, the sentence of life imprisonment was reduced. Pulia did not provide any justification for changing the sentence, concluding that the incident took place in a transaction and that the prosecution's version (of two separate cases) should have been believed: taken by the High Court. The theory was not distorted and could not be taken, no matter for interference, no appeal was refused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Chowk Maitla lawyer
