Find a Lawyer

NAWAB QUTABUDDIN KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SAEED KHAN

The permission to appeal paras 3, 8 and 16 (2) was granted to consider the effect of the provisions of the Martial Law Regulation 64 of 1959 on the basis of the agreement in lieu of restitution granted by the appellant to the defendant. Leased. The respondents' lease agreement stipulates that if the land or any part of the lease has become immovable, it will in turn be adjusted to the area after the declaration of martial law to its appellant. The respondent has to pay compensation for the equivalent of cultivated land. Rule No. 64, when a limitation was placed on the holding, the appellant would surrender to the maximum amount of land, including the house on which he was the owner, because the provisions of the Regulation did not affect the lease agreement. Frustrated with the law, the defendant withheld the trial court's injunction against the appellant's right to claim on equal ground under the abandoned agreement and otherwise kept the trial court criminal advocate from Faisalabad lawyer