Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFSAR versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

SSL 6 and 17 pre-appellant appellants did not press the dispute in the leave order. The question raised by the appellants is that the fact sold by the mutation is in favor of the co-appellant against whom the pre-authorization claim could not have been made and it was unfair to the trial court. Was remanded so that appropriate cases could be set up in light of the decision and a fresh decision of the court would be made according to the findings of the court on the latest issue or issues that resulted from the Supreme Court decision. best law firm from Kotla Pathan lawyer