Section 16 and 19 Evacuation proceedings Contempt of the landlord's lawyer in order to file a written statement on the date set by the High Court on the failure of the tenant to overcome the defense strike and obtain a remand. Being a tenant negligence, and on the condition that the rent controller of section 19 (2) was justified, he was ordered to be acquitted of an earlier section without proof of any substance without the landlord. Because she was not entitled to support the eviction order on a completely new basis and was the second time the penal provisions of section 19 (2). After the remand order, the remand was not attracted to the controller's proceedings after the remand order but is accepted as the Deputy Registrar High Court did not issue directions to the parties, so the tenant has to appear and file his written statement. Was impossible to do. On the due date, such facts, which are held, offered a reasonable excuse for failure to file a written statement on its history application Eels Acceptance and Case Remand
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
