GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus FURQAN AHMAD QURESHI
The grant of a foreign promoter license license obtained by the defendant under Section 12 Migration Rules, 1979, RR 8 and 9 Immigration Act (VII VII of 1922) Immigration Act, 1922 has been revoked and its security responds to the said Act. The alleged violation of the provisions of the Vendors was seized. In the prosecution case initiated against him, the court acquitted him, who requested reinstatement of his license but the same rejected constitutional request was rejected by the defendant because the statement of the permanent lawyer of the government was withdrawn if he When applying for a new license approval, its properties will be considered as well. Finally, it is informed that the license has been restored and the government has issued a proper license to comply with its requirements, however, I was told that the license was issued only on the misinterpretation of the High Court order. Under which respondent's license response renewal was not required by the government anothe tooth filing
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer