Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ versus STATE

In the first information report of the six witnesses to appeal to section 7307 Electile, it is mentioned but two of them did not examine the evidence of the complainant and other alleged witness which the High Court did not believe and depended only on the circumstances. Completely placed on the statement of the injured witness No recovery of any crime The accused has been charged with evidence of the injured witness who involved four persons, three of whom were from the defendant. The High Court verdict required a reduction in the case of acquittal of the accused and on the basis of the testimony of the evidence No question The law raised in the petition does not grant leave to appeal advocate from Noor kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes