Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAH JEHAN versus ABDUS SUBHAN KHAN


Representation of sections 67, 68 (1) (C) (D), (2) (A) and 99 (1) (E) of the People's Act 1976, evidence of corruption or illegal practices on allegations of illegal and corrupt practices Since the applicant is heavy, it is important to prove with convincing evidence through clear and convincing evidence that, if such evidence is included, he will have to decide on the principles applicable to the trial of the criminal case and In the event of any doubt, the defendant will have to go over the material. With regard to the record and circumstances of the case, it cannot be said that, directly or indirectly or through your agent, any illegal or corrupt practice has been considered as the law states that no evidence is available The voters of the applicants were forcibly barred from participating. Election applicant, plaintiff, failed to relieve the burden of proving illegal and corrupt charges against defendant

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Nilam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.