MAQSOOD ALI versus MESSRS METAL CONTAINERS (PRIVATE) LTD.
West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965 Section 72 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25 A workman was dismissed on the charge of dismissal, whether the appropriate worker participated fully in a domestic inquiry into corruption charges Employees were given a final hearing before dismissal. Orders were issued that employees should be admitted to the hospital before the dismissal order was issued. Wormman, he was required to be kept, he told his employer. Regarding his illness and hospitalization, he said that he requested his leave and Maddy Limited slip employer did not offer. In the absence of presenting a medical certificate to the employer, the provisions of Section 72 of Ordinance X of 1965 were not attracted, and the order dismissing the employees was not affected, and a complaint against his order was requested. Was proved to be misconduct against employees. Dismiss will not be sustainable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Pindi bhohri lawyer
