Section 22 and 68 of the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, the order of the Divisional Canal Officer was passed in favor of the applicants, which was sent to the Superintendent Engineer for verification or amendment, if any, as per the law for seven months. After being placed, placed aside. These applicants, who have been providing water for their area since 1950 and are entitled to include their area in the CCA, without having to give notice to the applicants and for any reason, continue to receive water, Held, the notice of reason is entitled to show that the principles of natural justice were violated before the approval of the negative order as the applicants were denied their hearing, the order of the Superintendent Engineer and the Appellate Court. The order maintains that the unlawful order was set aside and that the superintendent engineer after the trial The remand was given to confirm opportunities for applications. Is being heard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
