FATEH ALI versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE
Martial Law Regulation (Zone B) 1959 No. 9 Para 10 Overcharge Border Area Committee Re-allotment of land to the applicant in the name of the applicant, based on an invalid copy of the order canceling the land in the name of the applicant. Because of its entitlement, it could not be afforded an opportunity to present a reason why more money than its entitlement was fraudulently obtained or the applicant did not come to the court with clean hands. The report states that since the entire record was with the special judge. Anti-corruption, the committee could not record the positive effect that the land that was allotted to the applicant in the dispute was canceled in accordance with the law in the name of the Border Area Committee members who were present at the relevant time. He was still alive and his attendance could be obtained without charge. Delays and costs but they were not examined to find out that they had in fact passed the order of cancellation of the land allotment in the name of the applicant, the land of any imagination to any person again. Cannot Allot Unless the Allotment is already legally canceled in favor of the first Allotment, a Border Area Committee is sent to record the case. Consider a positive finding about the existence of the facts of the order canceling the land in the name of the applicant, and then consider another person's claim for land allotment in his favor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Murree lawyer