MALIK INDUSTRIES versus MUHAMMAD DIN
Meeting of Civil Procedure Code Order XVI and Attendance of witnesses O XVII, R 3 Defendant's closure of the evidence, whose evidence was closed, and the defendant's case was adjourned because of the absence of evidence, despite various motions. It was claimed that the reason for the postponement was not. The evidence cannot be closed because of any wrongdoing by him or her. If the plaintiff had the final opportunity to present his evidence, the High Court ruled and ruled in the cases related to the remand. Deciding to forward the name, he did not object. After providing the defendant with one last chance to present evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Lakki Marwat lawyer
