RAB NAWAZ versus SHAHNAWAZ KHAN
Para 25 ago, the claim of the land is claimed to be the tenant of the land sold as no evidence can be presented that the tenant's crop was sown in the land before such sale. It is reported that the crop was sown or sown by umpires before tenants. At the time of their inspection, the tenant of the shopkeepers in the revenue record had shown that the crop was sown in the land before the sale was effected, their estimate of the date of inspection was tar but it would not be considered. It was planted in such land. By the person who had failed to furnish the employer any proof, oral or documentary before the tenants occupying the land at the time of inspection to show that they had occupied such land at the time of sale or at the time of harvesting the crop. ? Evidence of being a tenant of land at the time of sale was not provided to the early emperors.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Renala Khurd lawyer