AZIZ AHMAD versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 compulsory acquisition of land, appeal against compensation, appeal against compensation as per the average sale given to the appellant owner, which has been more beneficial to him for the last five years, than the average claim. The cost of land is estimated by land. The acquisition of the documentary evidence was fully supported by the collector's evidence and the appellant was unable to prove through mere evidence that the collector's determination was in fact wrong. Unable to provide any evidence on record explaining. The fact is that he started the business on the ground in dispute as if the Collector himself had visited the place and after observing himself, the nature of the super structure raised by the appellant was estimated. And its finding was not successfully disposed of by the appellant by any evidence: the appellant was paid reasonable compensation and the order of the impugned order and trial did not demand any intervention in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Moro lawyer