ABDUL HAMID versus THE STATE
Sections 2 342 and 7 537 Legislative Evidence (of 10 of 1984 of) Article 161 The court is empowered to question any such accused as the court has warned before any stage of any investigation or trial. Without being considered necessary, may usually inquire into the accused. After examining witnesses for prosecution and before questioning the provisions of Section 7 537 CR PC's, the accused should be called upon to defend himself in case of irregularities, before the trial court judge. Contains an invert or change of the source entered search. Unless a complaint of irregularity in the trial was in fact a failure of justice where the defendants were called for their defense, all the prosecution's evidence was excluded and it was at the request of the accused itself that the witnesses Was recalled. Enable it to be further investigated and no new facts could be revealed against the accused as a result of such compensation. Section 342 million PCs were NNS
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Doaaba lawyer