KARAM SHAH versus GHULAM FATIMA
The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 section 42 of the Punjab Pre-Impression (1913) Section 30 mutation insertion by Patwari will not accept the right to make any speculative change related to the irreversible mutation but only through Patwari. Unexpected mutations will not matter. The importance, importance or value of the law, of course, is not a self-affirming mutant, but it will not be proof that the sale was made in a note of patriotism that describes the parties' seller or someone else's statement. had gone. The shopkeeper was recorded and needed to be proved by the evidence. Such note could be considered as the previous statement and had to be proved in the same manner as the earlier statement had to be proved but the oral sale was done. No documentation will be required to complete. When any kind of documentary evidence came into existence, it had to be proven with convincing and credible evidence when the specification was recorded on special end date, no oral sale and no proof of that. It was not that at that time the full sale price was paid and the land was then given to the latter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from More kunda lawyer