TAZEEM AKHTAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM
The Mohammedans la Khulla, the rightful groom, never failed to live with her husband, after the first cause of action against his wife failed, to present a fresh reason for his claim of divorce on Khulla's request. After the end of the first phase of litigation, new circumstances or developments emerge, to qualify her for claiming Khulla - her claim of abduction by the wife has not been proven. And then he confessed to the marriage against his parents' wishes. The litigation seems to have started with the pressure of the wife's parents, who did not reconcile with her husband. The petitioner apparently never filed such a case against her sovereign husband, and over time, the anger of the elders diminished. And they can allow the applicant and defendant to decide on the status of wife and husband. There is no basis for dissolving the marriage on the basis of khula, so it exists in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
