SHER MUHAMMAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
The Colonial Law of Punjab (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 10 of the Public Land was leased to the applicant through auction of public land rights, and the applicant paid the full cost of the auction and his rent. The respondent authority had certified in favor of the petitioner, however, despite confirming the auction in favor of the applicant, he claimed not to occupy the land in which the question was pending. Was done and it had unauthorized occupation of 79 families consisting of 745 people, so, it was not Getting empty homes and it is possible to capture the applicant / Lassie. On the statement made by the respondent authority to the court that some alternatives could be granted to the applicant, in similar terms, the applicant was satisfied that the court dealt with the constitutional petition with the observation that the applicant had some Alternative land be allocated. Under such terms and conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Balakot lawyer