GHULAM MUSTAFA versus ABDUL WAHID
CPC Adjustment AXVII of Civil Procedure Code XVII, RR 2 and 3 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Articles 85, 117 and 118 A foreclosure of evidence in which a party was executed in favor of the parties The evidence of which the burden of lying did not lie, where the parties presented their evidence, should be discussed in broader points which was not in any way to prove that the appellant was the owner. And to take over the matter. Upon their acknowledgment of the land, non-production in the sale process was not fatal to their position, according to the evidence by the respondents executing their favor in relation to the suit land, the Board of Revenue's decision, The appellant was effectively dismissed by the appellate court's evidence, rightly intervening. Appeal suit with trial court verdict and ruling dismissed [burden of proof]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from FR Peshawar lawyer
