West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 Detention Order Determination of concentration grounds, compiled by option in the custody order, in the juxtaposition, and subsequently referenced between the two disputed orders referenced in the comments. The difference was demonstrated in which it was reported that the notorious habit of detente and its heinous acts created panic among the general public and two notable criminal cases for its infamy, while partially in the comments. It was also said that the accused was involved in four criminal cases and a notorious drug smuggler. Who was detained was founded theories. The detention order was later dismissed as inconsistent with the doctrine of incompetence, the detention order, which faces unreasonable legal impairment, and the controversy over the detention order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1988