MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus GHUNDAI ALIAS SHARIF AND 3 OTHERS
Sections 302 and 394 of the injured prosecution did not identify the suspect's lonely witness, who claimed to have been found at a bad place, a place far away from the scene, between the three-hour gap. The incident occurred when the witness of the lonely prosecution witness saw the accused and at the time of the incident it was alleged that the accused was going to commit a crime, it would be difficult for the accused to be linked to the crime for which he was isolated. The testimony was imposed based on the evidence even if it was taken that he had correctly identified them. Order to acquit the accused who remains in the situation presented against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gambet lawyer
