SADULLAH versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, MULTAN
The question of determining the jurisdiction of the Settlement Commissioner to implement the contract of the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, Section 9, Para 33, is the question whether the parties to the payment of the cost of the property. Whether or not an association agreement has been implemented? Whether the applicant was properly executed or it was a forged document, the Deputy Settlement Commissioner was in contention that provided the parties with the opportunity to present evidence in support of their own pleas that they refused to enforce the agreement. Applicants did not benefit from nor did they question the jurisdiction of the Deputy Settlement. Referring to the commissioner to determine the truth of the contract, or to an authority to confirm his request, said that the officer was not able to question the realism or the compromised deputy commissioner, whose It was bound to resolve disputes in a way or to pass any order. Accept or reject it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
