SH. ZIARAT SHAFI versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Section 561A Electricity Act (X10 of 1910), Section 39A Electricity Rules, 1937, RR 31, 39, 48 and 120 Impact of Criminal Liability Civil Court Wapda Decree Demanding Notice for Payment of Electricity to the accused Challenge of demand for remittance paid civil suit, the amount paid by the accused, consequently returned as per the Civil Court order, the Civil Court made that amount illegal, invalid and non-refundable. The effective refund, which was held, had no effect on the criminals' criminal liability for theft of electricity. Quashment was not a matter of reuse
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Gilgit lawyer
