MUHAMMAD ABBAS versus THE STATE
Sections 302, 304, Part II, 325 and 148/149 of the testimony, the testimony of the witnesses reported two injuries to the victim's head, one by the accused and the other by the bad accused doctor, the only injury to which As a result, the deceased ocular died. The account did not show directly on the conflicting medical evidence record whose injury proved to be a fatal prosecution, failing to prove its case against the defendants as it was difficult to ascertain who was responsible for the fatal injury to Late Equitel. Was?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Karachi lawyer