Find a Lawyer

ISHTIAQ AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Application for termination of proceedings under section 561A, 439, 145 (5) section 1445 (1) section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), the CCP reported, stating that the dispute was a shop May cause a breach of the peace on the matter related to the magistrate. An emergency order has been ordered that the shops in the dispute be sealed until further orders when the applicant filed a review against the order of the magistrate before the session judge, but before the session judge decided the amendment, the applicant Relinquished and moved the application under section 45 application moved () and ?66 (1). To cancel his order to seal the shop, etc., which was rejected by the Magistrate Petitioner, then filed a petition before the High Court under Sections & AA and 9439, CCPC. That because the points raised in the review (before the session judge) were not appreciated, therefore, they were obliged to withdraw the petitioner's motion to withdraw the review from the sessions judge's court. Was. en Through this and then its attempt to achieve the same purpose by filing an application under Section 61AA&9, Cr, the CCPC equates to abusing the court and the law. As well as the order passed after the return of the review by the magistrate, the order of the magistrate could have been challenged under section 99, CRPC, and the section ision61 AA 43 439 for the applicant. There was no justification for filing an application under the CRPC, the High Court has the option of reviewing the magistrate's order. The petitioner, the High Court when you need a advocate from Matli lawyer