Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MIAN IFTIKHAR versus THE STATE


Sections 156 (1), 8, 9, 162, 163 and 171 of the Customs Act 1969, Article 573 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 abolish proceedings and the FIRVCR and Three cassettes of Indian films were recovered. No warrant was obtained in advance for the search of the premises raided, there is no written statement that the goods will be disposed of by a time warrant so there is no written notice that the search is in place. None of the statements reported under Section 171, Customs Act At the time of the alleged smuggling of goods, all acts carried out by the raiding party were illegal and violated the mandatory provisions of Section 171. That were not complied with due to any irregularities but not illegally curable under section 537 Yes, criminal procedure code action and FIR conditions were overcome

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Kallat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.