Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL AND 3 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Section 2 302/34 Circ Uncertain evidence motive allegedly involved with the accused and the deceased in connection with the removal of DC and are closely related No independent witness of the incident has been presented Where the police did not inspect anyone from the Dera where the VCR was played, the accused was threatened with serious consequences. A witness shop was charged with only two accused before the police. Other The two accused have neither been named in the FIR nor have the case been amended to involve the two accused in the case of threatening witnesses. Was found to be too weak in the case or inability to do so was generally not a matter of the prosecution's story. But in the case of circumstantial evidence, the stimulus constitutes an important situation and, therefore, should be very strong to point to the crime. criminal advocate from Swatmingora lawyer