Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AFZAL AND 3 OTHERS versus THE STATE


Section 2 302/34 Circ Uncertain evidence motive allegedly involved with the accused and the deceased in connection with the removal of DC and are closely related No independent witness of the incident has been presented Where the police did not inspect anyone from the Dera where the VCR was played, the accused was threatened with serious consequences. A witness shop was charged with only two accused before the police. Other The two accused have neither been named in the FIR nor have the case been amended to involve the two accused in the case of threatening witnesses. Was found to be too weak in the case or inability to do so was generally not a matter of the prosecution's story. But in the case of circumstantial evidence, the stimulus constitutes an important situation and, therefore, should be very strong to point to the crime.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Samundri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.