Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR AND 3 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Section 302/307/34 The incident occurred in the light of day, the eyewitnesses knew the accused before and had no difficulty in identifying the witnesses who were present on the occasion when there was a permanent enmity between the parties. In accordance with the truth and their statements. The first information was reported immediately and nothing on the record showed that it was not registered at this time and place because it wishes that the vacancies recovered from the incident in support of the witnesses of the collection. Prosecution witnesses are facing a successful investigation. Their statements support the statement of the Investigation Officer, who had no intention of retrieving the suspect in the forensic science laboratory report, which showed that the accused had been gunned down against the offenses recovered on occasion. ? Section 342, CRPC, acknowledged its participation and did not admit to firing on the dead defense version through any direct or indirect evidence and there is no reasonable possibility that the defense version was genuine. top advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer