Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FA ZAL versus THE STATE

Section 302/307 The first information report, filed immediately, used the name of the accused, the weapon, as it happened, in the light of the day the incident occurred in which two bodies were killed and injured. The accused is responsible for his injuries but has demanded his right to self-defense. Also, serious and sudden provocations test the eye witnesses successfully and their statements do not suffer from material contradictions, major contradictions, or dishonest improvements. It is appropriate in the statements and circumstances of the three-eyed witnesses. The motive in this case was proven by the statement of a credible witness who had no animosity against the accused's recovery. The report of the independent witness forensic science laboratory also showed that the accused's gun revealed the crime to be vacant. Which was not established by convincing evidence. law websites from Shangla lawyer